In re Marriage of Burke
Husband successfully challenged the trial court’s determination that court lacked jurisdiction to modify his spousal support obligation. Appellate Court adopted husband’s position that the trial...
In re Marriage of Burke

Husband successfully challenged the trial court’s determination that court lacked jurisdiction to modify his spousal support obligation. Appellate Court adopted husband’s position that the trial court retained jurisdiction to modify spousal maintenance, where decree provided that the court specifically retained jurisdiction “as provided by law.”

In re Marriage of Goodbinder
In post-dissolution of marriage proceeding, the trial court denied father’s bill of costs following his successful appeal of an earlier judgment and sentence for contempt....
In re Marriage of Goodbinder

In post-dissolution of marriage proceeding, the trial court denied father’s bill of costs following his successful appeal of an earlier judgment and sentence for contempt. Father appealed.

In re Marriage of Mohrlang
Former husband appealed from order of the Morgan County District Court valuing his interest as beneficiary in trust in dissolution action.
In re Marriage of Mohrlang

Former husband appealed from order of the Morgan County District Court valuing his interest as beneficiary in trust in dissolution action.

In re Marriage of Mraz
Although the court did not find in favor of mother’s argument that the court was prohibited from appointing a parenting coordinator due to her allegations...
In re Marriage of Mraz

Although the court did not find in favor of mother’s argument that the court was prohibited from appointing a parenting coordinator due to her allegations of past domestic abuse, the court did rule that the trial court erred in the length of appointment and in assigning the duties of a special master to the parenting coordinator. The parenting coordinator may make recommendations as to resolution of parenting disputes, but cannot issue binding decisions absent agreement of the parties. Further, the appellate court agreed with mother that the trial court failed to make findings sufficient to modify decision-making and exceeded its statutory authority pertaining to relocation orders.

In re Marriage of Page
Wife appealed from decision of the Douglas County District Court dividing parties’ property and denying her request for attorney fees.
In re Marriage of Page

Wife appealed from decision of the Douglas County District Court dividing parties’ property and denying her request for attorney fees.

Schultz v. Boston Stanton
Legal malpractice case. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The Court of Appeals agrees. If a...
Schultz v. Boston Stanton

Legal malpractice case. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants. The Court of Appeals agrees. If a trial court judgment is based on determinations of multiple issues — any of which standing independently would be sufficient to support the result — the judgment is not conclusive with respect to any of the issues standing alone.

The Kaplan Law, L.L.C. Team

Creative Solutions Tailored Specifically To Each Case

Testimonials

High-Level, Personalized Legal Services

  • Will discuss every option and provide sound advice

    “Extremely professional staff and attorneys who will discuss every option and provide sound advice leaving you to decide what to choose.”

    - Bijan R.
  • I have been lucky to be represented by true professionals

    “I have been a client of Kaplan law for a decade now. From the start Marc Kaplan, and his paralegal Jodie has handle everything their was todo with my divorces, and my child custody issues. As I'm not ...”

    - Andrew F.
  • He handled his part with integrity and zealousness

    “Marc is an excellent lawyer - my case was very complicated and he handled his part with integrity and zealousness”

    - Anthony F.
  • They were spot on in my case.

    “I have worked with Kaplan Law for the past eight years. In all cases, I found them to ALWAYS be well prepared. They provided me with accurate information, then presented viable, practical options for ...”

    - Dan M.
  • Experience and professionalism

    “Marc and Jodie have been amazing during a very difficult process. Marc's experience and professionalism is why he is one of the Top 100 trial attorney's in the country. Highly recommend him.”

    - Eric H.
kaplanlaw

kaplanlaw